On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 11:40:30PM -0500, Douglas Gregor wrote: > On Tuesday 04 November 2003 02:35 am, Pavol Droba wrote: > > Hi, > > > > During the review of the string_algo lib, one issue about the documentation > > has be risen. > > > > It is required to hide some implementation-details from the reference. > > More specificaly, it is required that some types can be disgised as > > "implementation-defined". > > > > Is there a way how to do this in the doxygen-generated reference? > > > > Pavol. > > There isn't currently, but of course I'm open to suggestions. Two > possibilities come to mind: > - use the xmlonly tag and put some custom XML that says "override foo with > bar" > - Use some heuristic that checks, say, if "detail" is in the type and then > mutates the type to "unspecified"
Both these idea seem ok to me, and I think, that it migth be good to have them both in disposal. Second one being more prefered in common, but having the first one as an alternative could be welcomed in some problematic places. In the heuristic check, if would search for 'detail::' but of course, this should be configurable by some paramter. > Haven't had much time to think about it, but it would be nice to solve this > issue... > It realy would be nice. Regards, Pavol ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ Boost-docs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe and other administrative requests: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/boost-docs
