On Friday 28 November 2003 01:20 am, Eric Friedman wrote:
> *Introduction*
>
> In this section:
> _Abstract_
> _Motivation_
>
> ...and then the subsections are laid out.
>
>
> In short <g>, I am asking whether the "in this section" title could be
> added. I believe it would make things appear more organized.
It might be that DocBook can do this already. If not, I'm sure there's some
way to introduce it easily enough...
> P.S. There also seems to be a minor bug in generating HTML for some
> method descriptions. I don't know exactly what the problem is, but
> examples can be seen in the generated HTML for bad_any_cast (Boost.Any)
> and bad_visit, bad_get (Boost.Variant).
These are all caused by <method>s that aren't within <method-group>s, which we
really aren't supposed to do anyway. I've fixed the XSL stylesheets so at
least we don't get that annoying "<listitem>" junk in the output.
Doug
P.S. I'd really like to get Variant's concepts moved over to the the
Caramel-based concept mechanism that's been languishing in CVS.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it
help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
_______________________________________________
Boost-docs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe and other administrative requests:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/boost-docs
