Jeff Garland wrote:
On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 08:26:35 +0800, Joel wrote
I could hack these tools (QuickDoc is especially easy) to
remove the boost- and Spirit-specific features, but I would
prefer to be able to use out-of-the-box generic documentation
tools that are actively used and maintained by a community larger
than just me.
Any recommendations on what I should do?
It's easy to decouple QuickBook a bit. A command line flag
can be used to make it generate either DocBook or BoostBook
(a superset of DocBook). I think that's what I want to do now.
This question has been asked a couple of times now.
You'll be a super-hero (you're already a hero :-) if you can allow some other
document forms. That is replacing this top stuff which is only good for
library documentation
[library date_time
[version 1.0]
[authors Jeff Garland]
[copyright 2001-2004 CrystalClear Software]
[category misc]
[purpose A killer date time library]
]
with something like this
[article
[authors Jeff Garland]
[copyright 2001-2004 CrystalClear Software]
[title A killer date time library]
]
If it's a pain, don't sweat it I can always transform the xml if needed...
That's the plan. I noticed this need when writing the QuickBook
documentation itself. It's not a library. It would be a waste if
QuickBook is only useful for library documentation.
I think it's easy to do. Yet, I'd like to hear from the boost-book
guys how to best achieve this. Doug? Guys?
Regards,
--
Joel de Guzman
http://www.boost-consulting.com
http://spirit.sf.net
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: thawte's Crypto Challenge Vl
Crack the code and win a Sony DCRHC40 MiniDV Digital Handycam
Camcorder. More prizes in the weekly Lunch Hour Challenge.
Sign up NOW http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;10740251;10262165;m
_______________________________________________
Boost-docs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe and other administrative requests:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/boost-docs
