James Fowler wrote:
Joel de Guzman wrote:
Hmmm, you can just send me the files and I'll do the diffs.
okay, they're attached...
BTW, can't we just make:
[link my_section]
work?
Maybe, but I'm not sure we should. [sectionlink ...] behaves a bit
differently than link. It automatically adds in the current library id
("stacktrack" in the example below) if it doesn't see a "." in the
target, and adds an extra attribute (/*endterm=""*/) in the
DocBook/BoostBook <link ...> element which tells it to pull the text to
be displayed for the link from the section's <title id="..."> element -
assuming that the /*linkend*/'s target has an element with the id
"*/target_id./title*". This has a number of implications:
[...]
If you still think we should try and roll it all into [link ...], I can
experiment with this some more (but it may be a few days...).
No, I am convinced. your no. 2 point is all that's needed to
convince me. I forgot about that. Thanks! I'll do a review
and integrate the code as soon as I can.
Cheers,
--
Joel de Guzman
http://www.boost-consulting.com
http://spirit.sf.net
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
Boost-docs mailing list
[email protected]
Unsubscribe and other administrative requests:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/boost-docs
