"John Maddock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> I've just read through the quick book docs with a view to using quickbook >>> for a type traits docs rewrite >> >> You might take a look at how we describe the library in C++ Template >> Metaprogramming; I think we've significantly improved on the Boost >> presentation in a few places. > > I'm well aware that the type traits docs have fallen behind.
I wasn't trying to point that out. It's obvious from your intention to rewrite. > It's just that there's a big "entropy factor" to overcome before I > can be motivated to rewrite something I've already written once ;-) I'm just suggesting you hijack some of our phrasing from the tables. It's simpler than what you have currently. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ Boost-docs mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe and other administrative requests: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/boost-docs
