I think I've discussed this problem here before, and I'm not precisely
sure what should be done about it, but:

  - FOP currently doesn't scale up well to handling large documents

  - This is acknowledged by the FOP developers; according to their
    site they are working on a rewrite projected to be done by the 2nd
    half of this year (I have no particular confidence in the accuracy
    of that prediction).

  - FOP is a Java program (eeeww).

  - LaTeX is great for large documents, and does formatting beautifully!

  - LaTeX has no native Unicode support

  - The Unicode package that exists for LaTeX works great in my
    experience, but requires some LaTeX knowledge to install and, more
    importantly,

  - It is no longer being maintained
    (http://www.unruh.de/DniQ/latex/unicode/)

  - There is OMEGA (http://omega.enstb.org/index.html%3Cintro:on%3E),
    though I am unsure how complete it is, and the fact that they
    trumpet their use of 16-bit character representation is not
    encouraging.

  - LaTeX has some other obscure limitations, like the inability to
    compute table column widths based on the contents of the cells

There are, to my knowledge, no other viable and *free* routes to the
creation of complex PDF documents (and I've done a lot of research, so
before you say "what about XXXX", check it out thoroughly).  The main
obstacle, of course, is the lack of a good layout engine.

Thoughts?

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com



-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
_______________________________________________
Boost-docs mailing list
[email protected]
Unsubscribe and other administrative requests: 
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/boost-docs

Reply via email to