João Abecasis wrote:
João Abecasis wrote:
I'm about to commit a couple of tweaks to quickbook's syntax
highlighting markup. These are mostly related to structure, the
changes should be transparent wrt to the final presented output.
All committed now. I updated the test to meet the new
specs/implementation...
I also removed the spirit grammars from the docs since it's too easy for
them to get out of sync with the code. My opinion, well, quickbook
should work as documented. The spirit grammars are implementation
details (and nice ones at that ;-).
Agreed. BTW, we ought to document the changes to v1.3. We can
add that in the front page. Lest, we'll forget what we
have done already. Looking back through the boost.doc list:
* quickbook file include
* strike-through
* better xml output
* regression testing facility
* code cleanup and refactoring
* allow phrase markup in the doc-info
* code blocks via ``code``
* quickbook versioning
* better (intuitive) paragraph termination
* fully qualified section and headers
* your nbsp and whitespace stuff
* what else?
Regards,
--
Joel de Guzman
http://www.boost-consulting.com
http://spirit.sf.net
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
_______________________________________________
Boost-docs mailing list
[email protected]
Unsubscribe and other administrative requests:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/boost-docs
