Eric Niebler wrote:
Eric Niebler wrote:
Joel de Guzman wrote:
Eric Niebler wrote:
2) Program listings and blurbs have faint grey outlines. TOCs and
tables do not. Looks funny. Either use them consistently or don't
use them at all.
3) The grey background of the program listings is lighter than that
used for TOCs and tables. Any reason not to make that consistent, too?
How's this: http://tinyurl.com/zb2t8 (tables)
and this: http://tinyurl.com/g44mm (TOCs)
The tables look interestingly like wikipedia's which I like :)
I don't see any difference from before. What did you change? It still
looks inconsistent in the same ways.
I take it back. These look great to me. The only nit is that blurbs,
tables and program listings are all of slightly different widths. But
that's pretty minor. On the whole, this is very nice.
Fixed. http://snipurl.com/o0kh and http://snipurl.com/o0ki.
We might want to redesign those icons though :)
Regards,
--
Joel de Guzman
http://www.boost-consulting.com
http://spirit.sf.net
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Boost-docs mailing list
[email protected]
Unsubscribe and other administrative requests:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/boost-docs
