"Eric Niebler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Looking at the end result, I can't say I think fop-0.91beta is an > improvement. :-P Unless you *really* need to embed png files, I say > stick with fop-0.20.X.
I expect that output is somewhat tunable. Is it just OOTB formatting that you think is no improvement, or does it look like there are more fundamental issues here? Care to post two PDFs for side-by-side comparison? Thanks, -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Boost-docs mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe and other administrative requests: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/boost-docs
