João Abecasis wrote:
> Joel de Guzman wrote:
> I really like this direction! In fact I have given some thought to the
> current quickbook grammar and the conclusion I came to is that it is
> highly redundant. We could probably get away with just couple of general
> rules and lots of templates (in code or otherwise).
We are in agreement. Feel free to devise a plan.
>> Examples:
>>
>> [footnote A sample footnote]
>> [blurb a blurb]
>> [note This is a note]
>> [tip This is a tip]
>> [important This is important]
>> [caution This is a caution]
>> [warning This is a warning]
>
> One question though... How do you decide where an argument ends and
> another begins? Brackets instead of commas?
I see no problem with commas delimiting arguments. If you have
embedded commas in your arguments, escape them. Example:
[note Hello/, World]
What am I missing?
Regards,
--
Joel de Guzman
http://www.boost-consulting.com
http://spirit.sf.net
_______________________________________________
Boost-docs mailing list
[email protected]
Unsubscribe and other administrative requests:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/boost-docs
