David Abrahams wrote:
Hi Dave,
It's interesting to note that some of your posts have this
double newline thing. Anyway...
> Are you the least bit worried about clashes with, e.g.
>
> int[3]
>
> and
>
> x[0]
>
> ??
Well, no.
1) 3 and 0 are not legal template identifiers anyway.
Perhaps:
int[x] or z[y] are better examples. But then...
2) If x or y are not in the template symbol table, then those
will not be regarded as templates.
3) int[x] and z[y] should be written as `int[x]` and `z[y]`
4) You are probably playing with quickbook if you use the brackets
as-is since those are the primary quickbook markup characters.
Quickbook tries to be forgiving if you do, but you better
know what you are doing.
> I really like the direction of driving more functionality into the
>
> "library."
Glad to hear. Yeah, me too!
Regards,
--
Joel de Guzman
http://www.boost-consulting.com
http://spirit.sf.net
_______________________________________________
Boost-docs mailing list
[email protected]
Unsubscribe and other administrative requests:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/boost-docs
