John Maddock wrote: > Joel de Guzman wrote: > Most of my remaining niggles at present concern our Jamfiles, and the > Docbook->FO translation phase: > > * pdf's really should be put in a "pdf" subdir just like the html is (they > would find any images then too!) > > * If you have an existing .fo file the XML->FO translation always fails, > could be fixed by always deleting any existing fo file before doing the > translation. > > * Syntax highlighting and indentation of code doesn't work: needs a custom > XSL layer. > > * Monospaced output should probably be in a smaller font: needs a custom XSL > layer again :-( > > * Hyperlinks aren't colored: yep custom XSL again I suspect! > > If I get any joy with dblatex I'll let you know,
I saw your dblatex sample -- it looks nice...I'm hoping this path succeeds b/c I agree FO isn't a good solution. While we're making a list of Jamfile issues, here's one other problem, I think, with the current Jamfiles -- no easy way to run only a single library. The reality is that a full Boost.pdf would be so big as to be unusable (date-time with full reference is ~500 pages). With date-time we've been working around this Jamfile limit with something of our own invention that allows us to generate just the date-time docs -- I can't recall the details since I've been hand's off of this and it's been so long since we had a release :-( Jeff ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Boost-docs mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe and other administrative requests: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/boost-docs
