Joel de Guzman wrote: > John Maddock wrote: >> OK looking through the xml this seems to be the case: certainly it crops up >> inside <tip>'s blurbs and anywhere else that \n's are required in place of >> paragraphs. >> >> Hmmm, was allowing \n a good idea? Bit late to change it now I guess though, >> might have been better to allow paragraphs inside tips/blurbs etc. Or can >> we map \n to a paragraph start (as long as <para> is allowed in the context) >> ? > > Looking back, \n and [br] is a poor decision. It originally came from > the original QuickDoc that generated HTML which at the time mapped to > the <br> tag. 1) I think we should deprecate it fast 2) allow paragraphs > in blurbs, tables, etc. As an interim solution, yes, we can convert > \n's to paragraphs, but emit a warning that it is deprecated. I'll > work on it ASAP.
Done. Blurbs, Admonitions and table cells (see Tables) may now contain paragraphs (as they should!). \n and [br] are now deprecated. Please see the docs for details. Regards, -- Joel de Guzman http://www.boost-consulting.com http://spirit.sf.net ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Boost-docs mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe and other administrative requests: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/boost-docs
