Rene Rivera writes: > No. That's why I said later versions of xsltproc, although the problem > is inside libxslt. First, using a patched version goes against the point > of standard tools.
No argument here. > If others decide to use other xslt processors they > are then SOL. Other processors might actually cope with this just fine. Did you try any of them? > Second, it prevents us from benefiting from updates of the > tools that fix bugs and improve speed. Strictly speaking, it does not. The patch is freely available as a diff (http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.lib.xslt/2329). You can always apply it to the latest sources and rebuild the binaries. -- Aleksey Gurtovoy MetaCommunications Engineering ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Boost-docs mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe and other administrative requests: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/boost-docs
