Matias, I'm posting this to the Boost.Docs list...
Matias Capeletto wrote:
>> > Why do you deprecated \n in Quickbook?? I really need it. Is there an
>> > option to undeprecated one of them [br] or \n. I need this to separate
>> > one function ref from the other in my docs. They are render too close
>> > for my taste and I do not want to edit the css because this is the
>> > only place where I need this.
>>
>> IIRC, the problem is that there's no legal way to
>> generate that in DocBook. A strict DocBook processor
>> flags it as an error. See the thread in Boost.Docs
>> titled "Quickbook, <sbr> and latex/pdf generation."
>
> :(
> very :(
> What is the best way to put some space then? I have used the hack of
> printing a small white image there (hidden behind a __SPACE__ macro) but
> it is very ugly.
Hmmm... how does:
<para> </para>
look like? How about:
<programlisting>
</programlisting>
?
If either of these work, then maybe we can probably keep the /n. Unless
someone else objects. In general, the idea behind DocBook is to
separate the formatting from the content, we're violating this with
this workaround. I'm not a purist, though ;-), but I'd have to say
that these are all ugly.
Does someone else have a better idea?
Regards,
--
Joel de Guzman
http://www.boost-consulting.com
http://spirit.sf.net
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Boost-docs mailing list
[email protected]
Unsubscribe and other administrative requests:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/boost-docs
