On 6/19/07, John Maddock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Matias Capeletto wrote: > > > (a) __ website params __ > > The new style, based on beta.boost.org including GroupedLinks and > > Google search box. > > > > grouped.links.chapters.show ( 'false' ) > > grouped.links.sections.show ( 'false' ) > > search.box.show ( 'false' ) > > I might be inclined to turn these on by default.
Ok, me too. The only one that makes me uncomfortable is the sections GroupedLinks, because users must provide a version of his own now. If I can manage to automate the creation of the xml definition when boostbook runs, then this worry will vanished. > > > [[[[ proposed ]]]]] > > > > # only the new style is supported > > page.style ( 'standard' ) > > > > # other small js libs may appear, we support this from the beginning > > javascript.lib.root ( concat($boost.root, '/doc/javascript/') ) > > > > grouped.links.chapters.* [ same as before, > > but point to > > boost.root/doc/boost_libs.xml ] > > grouped.links.sections.* [ same as before ] > > search.box.* [ same as before ] > > > > > > Style sheet and graphics > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > There are a lot of parameters here. IMO they can be reduced with > > out loosing flexibility > > > > [[[[[ current ]]]]] > > > > html.stylesheet ( 'boostbook.css' ) > > + Lots of parameters > > [[[[[ proposed ]]]]] > > > > Only html.stylesheet ( concat($boost.root, > > '/doc/style/boostbook.css') ) > > Yep. Great. > > Chunker params > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > If these are different from existing defaults, then we'll have to test the > existing libraries, and make adjustments as required. No, they are the same as before > > fo params > > =========================== > > John? These are fine? > > > > # Needed for FOP 0.2, set to zero for FOP-0.9! > > fop.extensions ( 0 ) > > xep.extensions ( 1 ) > > I think it may be possible to turn on both FOP-1 and XEP extensions, which > should keep most folks happy. FOP-0.2 is pretty awful! I'll check this. Ok. > > # pngs and pdf do not get along > > admon.graphics.extension ( .svg ) > > navig.graphics.extension ( .svg ) > > OK. The user can override these in his Jamfile anyway, so I think they > should probably be moved to fo.xsl. Good. > > Unused params > > ============================ > > These params will be removed > > > > doc.standalone ( false ) > > What does/did that do anyway? I know some folks are using it? I have no clue. It is not used anywhere! :) > BTW, when/if you add docs for all this, don't forget to add a link to > http://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/xsl/current/doc/ which is an > invaluable reference for tweaking Docbook output. The online book > http://www.sagehill.net/docbookxsl/ is pretty useful too. Agree. I have using both links a lot. > Thanks for persevering with this, John. The docs deserve it :) King regards Matias PS: How we can check that my test of Strict XHTML validation are fine? PS: Thanks to Daniel James, ie6 now support box-wrappers! ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Boost-docs mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe and other administrative requests: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/boost-docs
