----------------------------------------
> Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 08:50:14 +0000
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Boost-maint] [boost-maint][concept_check] Pull request
>
> On 19 February 2014 06:46, Marshall Clow <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> I think we (Boost) are committed to merging Stephen's changes to master.
>
> We're not really, he made them after being asked not to. It's up to
> individual libraries' maintainers whether they want to use them. IMO
> what we should do with modules where no one is dealing with changes on
> develop (all of them, not just Stephen Kelly's) is revert them in
> develop and create feature branches so that we can get master and
> develop in sync, but keep a record of the outstanding changes.
I'd rather take a less heavy handed approach and determine if the changes in
develop are easily merged to master and avoid having the changes potentially
get lost.
> Although In this case, I had a look at the changes while I was merging
> the warning fixes and they seemed fine (interestingly, there's a
> comment about gcc 3.4 that they remove which doesn't seem to match
> what the code does). I don't think anyone is opposed to removing
> support for these versions of GCC and Visual C++.
I'll try to determine if the changes can be merged standalone (without merging
other modules) and submit a pull request against master if they are.
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes:
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-maint
