Well, since the required buffer will have the same size on every
process, this is a very good question indeed.
I just trusted the comments on that one.
I'll have a closer look shortly (or maybe someone with better knowledge
can answer that one) but you're right, we can probably get rid of point
to point on that one.
The only draw back I can think of is that the communication of the size
will act as a barrier. Not sure if this is a real world problem though.
Cheers
Alain
On 20/10/2016 09:17, Lorenz Hübschle-Schneider wrote:
Hi everyone,
On 19/10/16 10:00, alainm wrote:
b) Not so trivial calls need to go though serialization, and
manipulate the
archive using point to point communication
I don't understand why archives would need to be communicated using
point-to-point communication. I've posted this before with no
response, but under which circumstances would something like
https://gist.github.com/lorenzhs/79dab54552fd1f9381da
fail?
Cheers,
Lorenz
_______________________________________________
Boost-mpi mailing list
Boost-mpi@lists.boost.org
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-mpi
--
_______________________________________________
Boost-mpi mailing list
Boost-mpi@lists.boost.org
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-mpi
