All videos would have both pre-rolls. We’d decide which pre-roll comes first on an individual video randomly. We can bike shed the correct algorithm. J
From: "Nevin :-] Liber" <[email protected]> on behalf of "Nevin :-] Liber" <[email protected]> Reply-To: Boost Steering Committee <[email protected]> Date: Thursday, February 2, 2017 at 11:00 AM To: Boost Steering Committee <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [boost-steering] Sponsorships (was Re: C++Now Videos: Time to Go Pro?) On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 12:30 PM, Jon Kalb <[email protected]> wrote: If we offered a non-exclusive Video Sponsorship, here is how it would work. If you just want to be a Video Sponsor you pay X (the non-exclusive rate) and you may be the only one. But if someone else also wants, they can pay X as well. Each video will have two pre-rolls with each coming first on half the videos. If you want to be the exclusive Video Sponsor you pay Y (the exclusive Video Sponsorship rate) and we’ll accept no other Video Sponsors. Once we accept a Video Sponsor, the exclusive Video Sponsorship is no longer available (except as an upgrade to the existing Video Sponsor). If it is non-exclusive, does the sponsor get a say in which talks they want their pre-roll on? I'm not saying they should or shouldn't; rather, we have to come up with a way that is fair. -- Nevin ":-)" Liber <mailto:[email protected]> +1-847-691-1404 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Boost Steering Committee" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Boost Steering Committee" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
