On 3/14/17 2:53 PM, Robert Ramey via Boost wrote: > All correct. This suggestion has been floating around since at least > 2010. I think it's time to implement it. I propose the following text > to be placed in the appropriate place. > > "Only those who have managed a boost review can expect their library > submissions to be to be reviewed." > > This clearly states the rule and allows for some exceptions.
OK - I've endorsed one of Naill's ideas in the form of the above suggestion. a) I think it's simple to implement. b) if it doesn't work it's simple to retract. c) We've had the normal back and forth about it - with the usual number of tangents and side tracts and I don't see a strong argument against at least trying it out. So let's try this out. The only thing is I don't have any idea who has the authority to implement this. The Review Wizard could just start implementing it on his own - though I'm not sure he'd be comfortable with that. So I'll guess that its the steering committee. I'll send them a copy. Robert Ramey -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Boost Steering Committee" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
