On Tue, 9 Feb 2021 at 14:56, Niall Douglas via Boost-users <boost-users@lists.boost.org> wrote: > Had ASIO been constructed after these became common, it would > undoubtedly have been designed around them. As it stands, some of us on > WG21 are hoping to target a Networking v2 design which is based around > GCD-type designs for C++ 26 or 29.
You are killing me. We got Networking delayed from C++20 to C++23 (hopefully) just to get it deprecated in C++26? What does Chris think about this? He is arguably been open to changes to Networking TS. Why don't you aim directly for such a "Networking v2", maybe for C++26 (by now I don't mind waiting another 3 years), and skip "Networking V1"? I am not going to pretend to get the details, but I understand there are a lot of more or less related moving parts (executors, io_uring, GCD, continuations...). So if it gets delayed so be it, we already have ASIO for the time being. But in 2021 work on trying to get something in C++23 with the idea of deprecating it on C++26 sounds... strange. _______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org https://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
