I dont think so... I guess int128_t under boost/multiprecision/cpp_int is the only viable option.
On Wed, 7 Apr 2021, 11:39 pm David Frank via Boost-users, < boost-users@lists.boost.org> wrote: > especially the gnu __int128? > Thanks, > David. > _______________________________________________ > Boost-users mailing list > Boost-users@lists.boost.org > https://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users >
_______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org https://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
