Hi Ion and Jaoquin - our own code is obviously more complicated than my
examples and currently uses 'list_member_hook<>'.
This morning I modified it to use tags and then later (when that
wouldn't compile) I tried using 'list_base_hook<>' - but both cases
triggered a compile-time assertion here in
'boost/intrusive/detail/generic_hook.hpp':-
BOOST_INTRUSIVE_FORCEINLINE void unlink()
{
/* This line asserts ---> */ BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT((
(int)hooktags::link_mode == (int)auto_unlink ));
node_ptr n(this->this_ptr());
if(!node_algorithms::inited(n)){
node_algorithms::unlink(n);
node_algorithms::init(n);
}
}
I know you can't see the code but could either of you take a guess at
what kinda thing might trigger that assertion? There's a mention of
'link_mode' so could it be because we're using 'boost::intrusive::list'
with dynamic linkage maybe (i.e. in a DLL)? My previous examples
compiled okay but of course they were very simple examples just running
in an exe
Thanks for any suggestions, John
_______________________________________________
Boost-users mailing list
Boost-users@lists.boost.org
https://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
