On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 9:12 AM Joaquin M López Muñoz < joaquinlopezmu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> May I suggest that you use boost::unordered_map instead of > boost::unordered_flat_map > for those small maps and see if this improves the performance of your > program? > > Thank you for the suggestion, I was hoping to keep all the elements sequentially in memory(general preference to make efficient use of cache, hard to microbenchmark), I will probably just stick to linear search or try my luck with flat_map(that in my experience has quite bad performance, but might work fine for this case). regards, Ivan
_______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org https://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users