> I notice that our type_traits headers still define:
>
> typedef char yes_type;
> typedef double no_type;
>
> Which is non-portable w.r.t. sizeof() differences. Is there any reason
> we can't change no_type to
>
> char (&)[2]
>
> or
>
> struct { char[2] x; } // if it needs to be constructed
I seem to remember that floating point types had a guaranteed minimum size,
but I can't see it in the standard, so I'll change that as suggested.
John Maddock
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/john_maddock/index.htm
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
