Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
"Paul Mensonides" wrote in messageIf a Spirit-based C/C++ preprocessor could really be faster with the Boost Preprocessor Library than commercial quality preprocessors 'out there' that would really rock! :D
news:001601c286c9$64eedf40$6401a8c0@;c161550b...
[about a C++ preprocessor]
>This one I'd like to see, but it might be too easy. There isn't much to
>Cpp.
Explain this to the MSVC and MWCW folks. They both got it wrong. That's the main reason for which I'd like an open-source, good quality C++ preprocessor.
And by the way, I understand some preprocessors take a pathologically long time with the Preprocessor Library (something I'm too scared to look at) so if Boost had a preprocessor offering, that would come in handily. Then, users could combine the Boost preprocessor with their compiler.
Dirk
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
