"Peter Dimov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> From: "David Abrahams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> "Peter Dimov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > From: "David Abrahams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >>
>> >> Even after applying other workarounds, the following patch seems to be
>> >> required to get the Boost.Bind test to pass on the latest Sun
>> >> compilers. Is it appropriate to apply this, or should this problem
>> >> cause the test to fail?
>> >>
>> >> - BOOST_TEST( bind(&X::hash, _1)(x) == 23558 );
>> >> + BOOST_TEST( bind<unsigned int>(&X::hash, _1)(x) == 23558 );
>> >
>> > I think that the right thing is to #ifdef the bind<> path for Sun only.
>>
>> Thanks for responding, Peter. Would you mind making that change?
>
> It would be more appropriate for someone with access to Sun C++ to make
> Sun-specific changes. :-)
Neither of us has that at the moment, but I want to make sure the
change doesn't get lost.
--
David Abrahams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost support, enhancements, training, and commercial distribution
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
