Kevin S. Van Horn wrote:
Looks like I may be wrong about the C++ Standard guaranteeing at least 32 bits to signed/unsigned int. I know I read this before, and I've seen it claimed on a web site, but I can't find it in the Standard. Maybe I read it in the draft Standard, and it didn't make the final cut.I think what you were looking for is footnote 39:
3.9.1/2 says that "Plain ints have the natural size suggested by the architecture of the execution environment (footnote 39 that is, large enough to contain any value in the range of INT_MIN and INT_MAX, as defined in the header <climits>.)"
limits.h is defined in 5.2.4.2.1 of the C89 standard (which I don't have a copy of) BUT
5.2.4.2.1/1 of the C99 standard says that an int must be able to support values in the range INT_MIN to INT_MAX, which must be at least -32767 and 32767, or 16 bits. I imagine that 5.2.4.2.1 of the C89 standard says the same thing.
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kevin Lynch voice: (617) 353-6025
Physics Department Fax: (617) 353-9393
Boston University office: PRB-361
590 Commonwealth Ave. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Boston, MA 02215 USA http://budoe.bu.edu/~krlynch
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
