Robert Ramey wrote:
(note: I consider this "registration" topic is a different issue from my registry class proposal. This one relates to "identification" of user classes, while mine is just an issue of factorizing responsibilities among library classes)I believe I have found the an acceptable resolution to the "registration" cunundrum.
I agree that this solution of the "identification" issue is quite right and would be very beneficial to the overall usefulness of the library. Bravo to Robert and Vladimir.
The perfect place for this function could be as a method of my registry class, don't you think? ;)I conjure up something like (pseudo code):register_cross_program_class_identifier<class T>(const char *id="T")
Alberto Barbati
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
