From: "David Abrahams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > This doesn't look too good if you consider the possible boost->std > > transition. :-) > > But "sp" does? <wink> > > How about dynamic_pointer_cast<T>(x)?
Fine with me. You are the LWG guy around here. Whatever you say. ;-) > Of course, we can make it work for regular pointers, too. That was kind of implied, yes, although I was more interested in extending the same syntax to intrusive_ptr and other (Loki-style, for instance) smart pointers. _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
