Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
>Even Microsoft will soon be supporting template template parameters andWell AFAIK it has never been required that Boost libraries support 'backwards' compilers. ISO/IEC 14882 compliant code would be acceptable. However, for usability, I agree that it is in everybody's best interest to support as many compilers as possible, which is what most Boost libraries do.
>partial specialization.
How long more MSVC6 is going to be actively used, do you think? Is there any
date/milestone since when we decide ignore non-supporting compilers for
specified features?
Dirk Gerrits
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost