On Sat, 23 Nov 2002 19:13:14 +0100, Boris Schäling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I read your library requirements. Thanks.
> I don't agree that a socket library should wrap rather than invent. Agreed that the C++ library should leverage the power of C++, but we could do this while remaining in some way familiar. The intent is to provide a clean C++ interface. Certainly at a higher level some form of smart address resolution should be provided, but I don't think that obviates the need for seperate address classes for seperate protocols, for those people who do not want to pay for functionality that they do not need. eg. for address resolution - should it also resolve decnet addresses? osi addreses? Hugo _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
