>>code fragments such as: >>line 95-96 of archive.cpp seem unacceptable to me: >> >>// note breaking a rule here - is this a problem on some platform >>is.read(const_cast<char *>(s.data()), size); > >Although is non standard I believe that the above code will work on all known platforms. >It yields an improvement significant improvement in efficiency ( I believe) without >any known detrimental effects. Perhaps I should leave the provably portable >code as a comment.
Isn't the following more acceptable: is.read(&(s[0]), size); _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
