"David Abrahams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > [...] > Well I hope that was all instructive, but it was probably way more > complicated than neccessary. I think it would actually be far superior > to build a solution around an mpl iterator adaptor like this one: > > template <class IteratorSeq> struct zip_iterator > { > typedef typename mpl::transform< > IteratorSeq,mpl::apply0<mpl::_1> > >::type type; > > typedef zip_iterator< > typename mpl::transform< > IteratorSeq,mpl::next<mpl::_1> > >::type > > next; > }; > [...]
Hey, you just wrote an MPL iterator adaptor! Cool! Dave _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
