> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Darryl Green > Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 1:47 AM > To: Boost mailing list > Subject: RE: [boost] Re: AW: Re: AW: Sockets > > > [...] > > Good point. There is currently no UDP support in my library. > Maybe traits > > could be used to tell the stream to discard data that couldn't > be written > > immediately? I am not sure if anything else had to be changed for UDP? > > > I really think a lower level/more flexible interface than the one > you propose needs to be provided if the concept is generalised > beyond common "socket" types (which is necessary, to me at least, > that's why we have written one - unfortunately I can't provide > source). Even with the more common socket types, there are some > interesting usages to consider as Hamish suggests. Out lib uses a
Okay, no problem for me. Then we should start and complete a library design? Boris _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
