"David Abrahams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > [...] > When neccessary. It's not as though a "strong guarantee assignment" > is a fundamental operation which people often need.
Which is why the swap idiom assign perhaps shouldn't be the default implementation. > [...] > Which type trait name? is_base_and_derived<>. I see that's the actual name. I wasn't sure, because I recalled there being some debate about the name, and didn't know if it had changed until I looked it up in the docs. > > I just added that in for safety. > > Added what? The static assert. > [...] > Don't you want the static assertion in the constructor or in the class > body itself? I guess that makes sense. I obviously didn't think about it too much. > [...] > I'm not sure it's useful enough to warrant putting it in > utility.hpp. Fair enough. > Also I have concerns about the name "assign()", since > that is used in the standard library to mean something > slightly different. I don't recall seeing this. Where is it used? Dave _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
