David Abrahams wrote: [...] > > I would be extremely surprised if anyone could make any worthwhile > > legal claims against any user of a major Boost library because of > > Boost itself. > > Whether or not it's "worthwhile" really depends on the goals of those > bringin suit.
You're making progress, Dave. ;-) http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/25505.html (Red Hat clarifies stance on software patents) <quote> And to back that up the company has issued a pledge not to defend its patents against use in open source products. So long as the terms of the GNU General Public License v2.0; IBM Public License v1.0; Common Public License v0.5; Q Public License v1.0; or any Red Hat open source license are followed, you're good to go. </quote> regards, alexander. -- http://www.redhat.com/legal/patent_policy.html _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
