"Jeff Garland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> Thanks, Jeff! >> >> Not to look a gift Wikimaster in the mouth, but would it be possible >> to do something like: >> >> >http://www.crystalclearsoftware.com/cgi-bin/boost_wiki/wiki.pl?Boost_Documentation_Format/Tasks > > > >> where each license link is listed separately, a sign-up item is >> available, and possibly with a sub-page for each license's summary? > > I pulled the list of licenses off the opensource.org page and > set it up so that one can just click the license name to add a > sub-page.
Thanks! > I'll let you add some detailed expectations on the > process once you have done a couple :-) I would be happy to. > http://www.crystalclearsoftware.com/cgi-bin/boost_wiki/wiki.pl?Boost_License It would help to have a link to the actual license text in some obvious place, either next to the entry on the main page, or on the subpage. > I'm curious, isn't there a whole set of GPL derived licenses we can > just ignore since we already have discussed at length why these > aren't suitable? Probably. Someone has to explicitly rule them out though. It shouldn't take long, if the license boldly violates one of the terms of the Boost license requirements. > I'm just thinking we should focus our time on BSD-like licenses > since they are more likely to be compatible... The whole point of this process is to help us define what we should focus our time on. -- David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.boost-consulting.com Boost support, enhancements, training, and commercial distribution _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
