At 11:26 AM 11/30/2002, David Abrahams wrote:
>"Peter Dimov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Google tells me that I was wrong, and the "correct" implementation was
>> originally suggested by C. Green in
>>
>> http://lists.boost.org/MailArchives/boost/msg00886.php
>
>Hmm. Can anyone track him down to get permission to use it? I don't
>recall seeing his name in any recent postings.
Mmmm... While I think it is great if you discuss it with him or her, and
I've sent you the email address privately, I also think that simply
crediting him or her is enough.
Should we be worrying about a code snippet posted on a public mailing list
like Boost's, particularly one so short and with no indication of any wish
to consider it anything other than a typical throw-away posting?
I'm all for bending over backwards to protect Booster's intellectual
property rights, but I having a lot of trouble applying IP concepts to such
a posting. Am I off-base here?
--Beman
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
- Re: [boost] Re: Political correc... Terje Slettebø
- Re: [boost] Political correct (w... David Abrahams
- Re: [boost] Political correct (w... Terje Slettebų
- Re: [boost] Political correct (w... David Abrahams
- Re: [boost] Re: implicit_cast invento... David Abrahams
- [boost] Re: implicit_cast invent... David B. Held
- Re: [boost] Re: implicit_cast in... David Abrahams
- [boost] Re: Re: implicit_cast in... David B. Held
- Re: [boost] Re: implicit_cast in... Thorsten Ottosen
- Re: [boost] Re: implicit_cast in... David Abrahams
- Re: [boost] implicit_cast inventor Beman Dawes
- Re: [boost] implicit_cast inventor David Abrahams
- [boost] Re: implicit_cast inventor Carl Daniel
- [boost] Re: implicit_cast inventor Alexander Terekhov
- Re: [boost] implicit_cast inventor Peter Dimov