David Abrahams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > David Sankel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Hello, >> >> Browsing the Boost.Python documentation, I've begun >> to wonder why they python library should be a part of >> boost. >> > I'm not going to try, but I will say that the question of whether > Boost.Python is appropriate for standardization came up several times > during the Boost.Python review. For some reason I seem to be unable to > locate the review commentary in our mail archives.
Ah, here it is (most of it, anyway): http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/search?query=py_cpp+review&type=Archive_boost_list http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Mail/Message/1143107 -- David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.boost-consulting.com Boost support, enhancements, training, and commercial distribution _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
