le Mardi 3 Décembre 2002 22:38, [EMAIL PROTECTED] écrivit : > It's done but not commited yet. I think it will live in test/details for > couple days until I prepare docs. Is it ok?
sure >> btw, since it's either wrapping a sstream or simulating one from a >> strstream, I think something like 'wrap_sstream' is a bit >> more precise than >> 'wrapstrstream'. > > Ok. oops, I forgot 'sstream' is the name of the header while the class itself is named 'stringstream' (a bizarre situation) wrap_sstream still looks ok to me as a filename, but my arguments were a bit wrong as I implictly talked about classes, rather than header filenames.. let's say this file wraps the sstream _header_ .. or you can call it wrap_stringstream. might be best. -- Samuel _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
