"David B. Held" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Because you want to get at the T in h in a portable way. Which brings | me to my next point. Since it seems this is the only context in which this | cast is guaranteed to give a meaningful result, maybe it should be called | placement_cast<>?
But then, in which is it better than reinterpret_cast<>. -- Gaby _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
