"David B. Held" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | "Eric Woodruff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message | asli92$oqn$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:asli92$oqn$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... | > [...] | > > > > holder<Foo> h; | > > > > new (h.storage) Foo; | > [...] | > So the type really is of Foo, | > [...] | | No, the type really is char[sizeof(T)] converted to char* const. Since the | pointer never was Foo*, I don't believe reinterpret_cast<> is obliged to | give you a valid Foo*.
What do mean exactly by a "valid Foo*"? -- Gaby _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
