Gennaro Prota <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 06 Dec 2002 09:05:38 -0500, David Abrahams
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>You may be right. How about this approach instead?
>>[...]
>>
>
> Sorry for the late reply. I'm certainly missing something here because
> I thought the solution was just to replace "defined(symbol)" with "(0
> < (symbol))". No?
I don't know. My approach at least detects an explicit define to zero,
FWIW. If someone wants to change the implementation, it's fine with me.
--
David Abrahams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost support, enhancements, training, and commercial distribution
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
