"John Maddock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> If this fails to compile, we may need to add a dummy "return 0;" at
>> the end. I know of two compilers which act this way: Metrowerks and
>> HP.
>
> What do you want to call it?
I'm not happy with it, but...
BOOST_NO_NON_RETURN_PATH_COMPREHENSION is the best I could come up
with :(
--
David Abrahams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost support, enhancements, training, and commercial distribution
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
