On Mon, 09 Dec 2002 08:49:01 -0500, David Abrahams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>No, I just meant that a falsely succeeding test is very _unlucky_. Yeah. The reason why I said it was a lucky case is that I was thinking to real code, not to the test: in real code where you want #if BOOST_WORKAROUND(MACRO, >0) to be equivalent to #if defined(MACRO) && (MACRO >0) you want the condition to be false when MACRO is not defined, which is exactly what you were getting. In your test instead, it was a very unlucky case, as you say :-) >[...] >I'd like to change that as follows: > > #define BOOST_WORKAROUND(symbol, test) ((symbol != 0) && (symbol test)) > >Just in case. Good. Genny. _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
