"David B. Held" wrote: > > "David Abrahams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > [...] > > Reminder: If you haven't done one yet, please take a moment to review > > one of the licenses at > > > > > http://www.crystalclearsoftware.com/cgi-bin/boost_wiki/wiki.pl?Boost_License > > I finally knocked off a few of these bad boys. Not sure if my reviews > were totally coherent. I was a little distracted doing some of them.
Yeah. I've briefly looked at the "review-summary" for LGPL and CPL. I have a question. Could someone please clarify for me the meaning of the following "requirement": "Must not require that the source code be available for execution or other binary uses of the library." It is not clear to me what/which "source code" is meant here. The meaning of "other binary uses" isn't clear to me either. TIA. regards, alexander. _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
