"Eric Woodruff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Peter Dimov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> 003f01c2a06f$2c4f6550$1d00a8c0@pdimov2">news:003f01c2a06f$2c4f6550$1d00a8c0@pdimov2...
>> From: "Eric Woodruff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > Using g++ 2.95.4,
>> >
> Doesn't make any difference with the outcome in theory or in my test as I
> just tried it.
>
> int main () {
> boost::shared_ptr<void> p (new Object);
> }
>
> No destructor printed.
I'm not really sure what you mean by "in theory". Theory, (and
practice on most compilers) indicates that shared_ptr<void> works and
should delete the Object. If it is not happening for you, it's
probably a bug in your compiler. I note that gcc 2.95.4, like 2.96
which Redhat so inadvisedly shipped, is not an official release. A
list of official releases can be found at:
http://gcc.gnu.org/releases.html
--
David Abrahams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost support, enhancements, training, and commercial distribution
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
