At 10:48 AM 12/11/2002, Yitzhak Sapir wrote:
>On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, Beman Dawes wrote:
>
>> The Win32 regression tests are working again, but there are a lot of
new
>> Borland failures.
>>
>> See http://boost.sourceforge.net/regression-logs/cs-win32-diff.html
>>
>> It looks like some change to a commonly used library is causing an
>> assertion to fail in the Borland compiler.
>>
>> There are also some new failures with other compilers.
>>
>
>Is it possible to have tests generated for still-widely-used but maybe
not
>up-to-date compilers, like MSVC6.5 and MSVC6.5+STLport?
That's been requested before, as well as adding the Comeau compiler, and
both would be useful. The only reason they haven't been added is lack of
time.
I'm going to be doing some work on the regression tests over the next week
or two; maybe it will be possible to add a couple of additional compilers.
Thanks,
--Beman
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
- [boost] Win32/Borland failures Beman Dawes
- Re: [boost] Win32/Borland failures Yitzhak Sapir
- Re: [boost] Win32/Borland failures Beman Dawes
- Re: [boost] Win32/Borland failures John Maddock
- Re: [boost] Win32/Borland failures Beman Dawes
- [boost] Re: Win32/Borland failures Edward Diener
- Re: [boost] Win32/Borland failures John Maddock
- Re: [boost] Win32/Borland failures Beman Dawes
- Re: [boost] Win32/Borland failures John Maddock
- [boost] Re: Win32/Borland failures Hugo Duncan