On Thursday 12 December 2002 01:06, Jeremy Maitin-Shepard wrote: > It seems quite clear from the Boost.Compatbility rationale that extensions > to the C++ standard library do not belong in it. OK. And indeed boost _is_ an extension. So I think it makes sense to implement all these extensions in boost also (as Herve has done) and provide them in the boost namespace.
My only remaining question is : if the STL (used by the developer) already provides the algorithm (in the std namespace however), would'nt it be better to reuse it. Maybe that algorithm is written in a way to offer the best performance with that compiler ? toon _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
